Episode 4: The Disappearance and Murder of Marie Jane Carlson - Pt.1


mariecarlson

About this episode:
Project Sunlight host, Rissa, talks about the disappearance of trans woman Paula Del Mundo from the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport, and the murder and disappearance of Marie Jane Carlson from Fort Walton Beach, Florida.


Show Notes


Transcript

RISSA: Hello and welcome to Project Sunlight, a podcast that merges true crime and social science. The show discusses the more than 150 documented missing and murdered Filipinas in the United States. I want to apologize for taking a longer break than I had intended. I know I've been gone on an unintentional hiatus for the last few months; with the holidays and the need to spend some time clarifying my life's direction, I finally feel like I'm back on the horse. You may have noticed that the number of missing and murdered Filipino women that I mention in the intro has changed. Unfortunately over the last few months there have been more Filipinas killed. Others were discovered by digging through digital newspaper archives. I've never expected the number to remain fixed, and no one else should either...but it never gets easier. 

I want to say to also thank you for your patience with the schedule, it's not easy to carve out the time and space to produce this podcast when I'm not doing it full-time. I don't have an assistant or a team helping me, so right now it's a one-woman show. I do the research, writing, producing, social media and recording. The show will be on a regular schedule now, so you can expect the podcast to be coming out once a month, however, I am aiming for more and more frequency because I now recognize that the audience and the appetite for this kind of show exists. 

When I decided to take on this episode I had no idea that the case I'd be featuring would be so complex to piece together. This episode went from being one to being split into two; I just didn't see any other way to do the story justice and I refuse to half-ass it. 

You can donate at the Patreon link which is patreon.com/projectsunlight to support the show and maintenance of the database. This helps me out because I do have to subscribe to several digitized newspaper archives to glean what little that exists about gendered crime against Filipino women. The dearth of information presents a constant challenge, although we know there are numerous open and unsolved cases. Having to put together a timeline with so much missing and conflicting information or otherwise vague information was difficult, especially in this case. 

One topic that will come up again and again on this show is that of mental health. It’s a stigmatized subject in our society but it’s becoming increasingly less so thanks to the internet and advancement of modern medicine. In today's episode, we'll be talking about the subject of abuse, being diagnosed with a mental illness, and its implications in the life of a Filipina mother who goes missing from Fort Walton Beach, Florida in 2011. 

However, before we get into the episode, I have a quick public service announcement that I need to make about another Filipina who is currently missing from Dallas, Texas. I would normally create an entire episode around this case, but it's an open case with an ongoing investigation and there's just not enough information at this time.

Pauline or Paula Del Mundo is a 59-year-old Trans woman who disappeared from the Dallas Fort Worth Airport during a layover en route to Cozumel, Mexico on September 14, 2019. Pauline never boarded her flight to Mexico via American Airlines, instead, she called her sister to say that she had changed her mind and would be returning her place of residency, Tampa, Florida. She needed help purchasing a return ticket...I'm not sure if she needed help with the money, or if she just needed someone to talk her through it.

The hotel where Pauline was due to check in confirmed that she did not arrive for her reservation. Pauline is a Certified Nursing Assistant or CNA at a veteran's hospital and recently suffered a rotator cuff injury which has been a source of stress for her lately. 

According to Pauline's sister Lolita, who lives in Florida, she didn't sound like herself but instead sounded distraught over the phone. The feeling that I get from the interviews with Pauline's family is that she was unusually incoherent and in a heightened state of despair. When her sister attempted to call her back, she was unable to reach her. 

"We feel she is not in her right frame of mind," Pauline's other sister said, referring to Yolanda Del Mundo in an interview with Watermark Newsmagazine. "She was on the verge of desperation and we are so worried...It was such a nightmare for our entire family because she was the kind of person who is bubbly and loves her trips documented," Yolanda explained. "Unfortunately, we never heard from her since then…it was so frustrating."

Pauline was captured on CCTV footage from the airport at 10:30 p.m. wearing a white shirt and lavender pants. She is a naturalized American of Filipino descent. She is a 59-year-old male-to-female trans woman. She is 5'6 and of medium build, between 130-140 lbs with long brown hair, brown eyes and she speaks with an accent. She has a flower tattoo on her right forearm, and she wears full dentures. 

A tip has since been received via private detective that Pauline was spotted on camera at 3:52 a.m. on September 15, one day after her disappearance, walking alone from Terminal C for miles until the south exit toll. Her sister says that she seemed to have been walking aimlessly and last seen about a mile away from the nearest gas station. The address where she was last seen is South Airfield Dr. & South 20th Ave. Euless, Texas 76039 and again this is right near DFW airport. 

Information I've gotten from Community United Effort aka the Center for Missing People goes into further detail on Pauline's movements. She was seen on surveillance footage in Terminal C at 10:30 pm. She walked 2 and 1/2 miles up International Pkwy away from the airport going south, walking by a valet gate. Seen on footage going towards the warehouse district at 1:48 am. She walked across the street across from warehouses and sat on the curb. She’s seen sitting on the curb in the south end of the official warehouse district off of the intersection of South 20th Ave and S Airfield. She then abruptly gets up and walks away from the curb at 3:52 am. She walks around the corner of the curb going East, goes around a DFW airport sign (footage of her is obstructed by sign) and that's the last that is seen of her on the footage. The main road goes North and South. This warehouse district that Paula was last seen near is off of the main road. Technically its airport property but is leased out to different private companies. The intersection she was last seen at is surrounded by construction, ditches, ravines, swampy areas, a small lake and lots of wooded brush areas that are hard to search with a small number of people. It appears that she headed East after going out of view of the surveillance camera.

Pauline's family fears for their sister's safety due to recent anti-transgender driven violence in Texas, two of three murders occurring in Dallas. According to the Human Rights Campaign, more transgender women are murdered in Texas than in any other state. 

Detectives do not believe that Pauline took an Uber or but didn't rule out the possibility of a taxi. Even with the help of FBI trained dogs, there has been no evidence of a body in the area surrounding the airport. 

Yolanda says their family has been frustrated with the investigation "We want all the support from the public, most especially the LGBTQ community," Yolanda del Mundo goes onto say in the interview with Watermark. "My sister's life is at stake in Dallas and it seems authorities are slow in providing updates on her whereabouts."

Pauline's family members have been flying between Tampa and Dallas in their continuing search efforts, working with detectives and human rights organization Malaya Movement Texas to canvass the area. 

"We hope and pray that all necessary concerted efforts be made to search and find her as we are nearly losing hope to get her back," Yolanda says.

To date, her disappearance remains to be a mystery to her family. She has been reported and included in NAMUS,  the National Missing and Unidentified Persons System, a national database for missing, unidentified and unclaimed person's cases. However in NAMUS, she’s listed as a male named Paulino Del Mundo. Due to HIPAA privacy, the family has been unable to gather information about Pauline from hospitals, mental institutions, shelters, entertainment bars, and even the morgue. Her Facebook profile is blocked while access to her Grindr account, a networking app for gays, transgenders, lesbians and queer people could not possibly be opened under certain restrictions. 

Disappearances like Pauline's are becoming more and more common, it's not just sensationalism on the part of the media. Transgender women of color are at risk of being targeted in a violent assault, many go missing and are found later deceased. In a situation such as Pauline's where her mental state could impact her decision making, she could be especially vulnerable to those who may seek to take advantage.

Anyone with information is asked to call the Dallas-Fort Worth airport's Department of Public Safety at 972-973-3434, Detective Sgt. Karl Ross at 972-391-7221, or the Community United Effort Center 24-hour tip line at (910) 232-1687, any information submitted will remain confidential. 

This episode we're going to be talking about the disappearance and murder of Marie Carlson from Fort Walton Beach, Florida. I relied heavily on a warrant issued by the Oskaloosa Sheriff's Department on May 5, 2015, with the narrative written by one of the lead investigators on the case, Sgt. Neslihan Suhi-Moore. The other lead investigator, in this case, is named Keith Matz. There's also a 2015 episode of Cold Justice that features Marie's case, and this got Marie's case national attention. Another 2018 Dateline episode also covered Marie's case and all of these resources, of course, will be in the show notes like in episodes prior. 

Marie Jane Carlson was born on October 7, 1974, in the Philippines. Although her background is vague, Marie is thought to have been raised by her stepmother, Florencia Bridges and father Charles R Bridges. Marie grew up unaware of her real parentage, having been told she was born to a single mother, Nina Akkeson believing that she was 'taken in' by an American serviceman and his wife. Later, Marie discovered that she was half-sisters with her best friend, that the serviceman was her father. 

Marie moved to Florida with her sister Esta, and they got an apartment together behind a karaoke bar where they were a hit with the locals. Esta said in her interview with Dateline that they were like celebrities, and I can believe that easily...Marie's pictures show a glowing, happy and fun-loving woman. A woman named Kay Barber, who helped Marie when she was in a hard place after meeting her at the age of 18, became like a mother figure to her and said that Marie's favorite word was 'beautiful.' Her favorite color was pink. She loved to cook, sing, craft jewelry and study the Bible. 

Marie obtained her Bachelor's Degree in Criminal Justice and at some point moved to Colorado. She seemed to enjoy her job as a booking deputy with the Colorado Police Department, but her ultimate goal was to become an FBI agent. She eventually married a man named Jeff Carlson, who would learn that Marie had been a victim of sexual assault, although further details about it have never been revealed. He talks about how this trauma caused Marie to struggle with loving herself, and eventually their marriage ended amicably. You could see the pain in his eyes  and hear it in his voice when he describes how much he cared for her in interviews. 

Again, the explanation given is vague, but Marie drifted in and out of jobs and it seems the trauma from being sexually assaulted followed her around. She was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder, but I want to be careful in making any assumptions since I'm not a mental health professional and it could have resulted from a variety of different factors from trauma, to the environment, to genetics.

I do want to talk about what characterizes Bipolar and the difference between Bipolar I and II based on the research that I conducted for this episode. Believe me, we'll need to revisit Marie's Bipolar diagnosis later, so if you don't know much about it this is foundational for understanding questions I'll raise later. While it's never really clarified as to whether or not Marie had Bipolar I or II, but my guess is Bipolar II due to the number of years she had been grappling with it and as we go along I think you'll understand why. 

Once again, here's my disclaimer: I'm not a mental health professional. I do have personal life experience as far as knowing people diagnosed with Bipolar II, so I have a lot of empathy for those who struggle with it. I just want to make it clear that what I'm presenting here is based on factual information and not my conjecture. 

Bipolar doesn't have an exact cause, because as I said before, from brain chemistry changes to genetics to environment - these can all be contributing factors. So we can deduce that a combination of all three might result in some individuals being more at risk for developing Bipolar than others. 

If you've heard of the terms 'Bipolar I' and 'Bipolar II' and wondered what they referred to, it's a difference in severity; Bipolar I features manic episodes while Bipolar II features hypomanic episodes. Bipolar I is generally considered more severe because of the type of manic episodes someone would experience which would show features such as a very energized state, extreme insomnia, restlessness, and impulsive decision making. 

Someone diagnosed with Bipolar II would experience a hypomanic episode that is less severe in nature but similar in symptoms, however, it would also be accompanied by a major depressive episode. People diagnosed with Bipolar II don't generally experience manic episodes that require hospitalization. Behavior during a major depressive episode includes losing interest in hobbies or activities, changes in diet, insomnia or sleeping too much, feelings of worthlessness, suicidal thoughts, and other similar symptoms that are too numerous to list. 

As far as it has been revealed, Marie was on medication for her Bipolar but the details of how she dealt with it otherwise just aren't available from what I have researched. There's no information on whether or not she received counseling if she regularly took her medication and whether or not the medication prescribed even worked. Most people don't cure themselves of their diagnosis with the first prescription, it's often that dosages are adjusted. It's not uncommon for a doctor to completely switch a patient's medication depending upon their response. Counseling is also usually recommended by doctors in combination with medication, but let's also be mindful that finding one you're comfortable with can be an extensive process...and that is normal. 

Addressing and treating your needs after a diagnosis is a multi-part process and it takes a lot of fortitude. Not to mention, money. Taking care of your mental health just as important as treating unrelated physical conditions but it's really difficult to navigate the health care and insurance realms, plus there's the added stigma by society...it's a lot.

Navigating treatment after diagnosis while amid personal life upheaval had to have been tough for Marie. Remember that she also did not know that the man who raised her was her father, or that she had half brothers and sisters with whom she lived under the impression that she had been taken in in...or adopted, whatever story she was told until she learned the truth. Marie was also born in the Philippines and at some point later moved to Florida, so there could have also been elements of culture shock and identity questioning as a 1st generation Filipina.

When Marie's marriage came to an end with Jeff, he suggested being their three-year-old daughter's primary caregiver while Marie worked on stabilizing her life. Initially, she pushed back against the idea as many mothers would, but eventually agreed to the arrangement. 

Marie called and visited her daughter Paris frequently, so she was always in contact with her. Jeff said he was happy for her when she joined Calvary Chapel Emerald Coast and had found God, as well as a tight-knit community that welcomed her with open arms. Of course, if everything from this point went smoothly we wouldn't be here telling her story. 

Similar to how Marie was taken in by her friend Kay Barber, Marie found herself accepting help while in a trying time from a couple deeply involved in the church's ministry and community, but it would end up being a fatal mistake On the surface, it's quite easy to understand why Marie would have looked to the Flanders of the Calvary Emerald Coast Church, for comfort and support. The church is now known as the Emerald Coast Church Assembly of God. Calvary Emerald Coast church was casual in a humble, jeans and t-shirt kind of way. James, in his early 40's, was the epitome of your local pastor in the suburbs, nothing special..he was bald and wore glasses. He was described a charismatic pastor, he did manage to grow his church and online following by uploading his sermons to Youtube. Tanya seemed to embody her role of a pastor’s wife in every way. She was modest, brown haired, of average build and in every picture she’s smiling and very cheery. 

James and Tanya Flanders were dutiful community servants, but beyond that they were well respected by their congregation. Tanya was head of the women's ministry, and together she performed Christian worship music with James…I won't link to, trust me, you're not missing anything. 

Many of the details in the 2015 warrant from the Oskaloosa County Sheriff's Office, describe the dynamics of the relationships between the Flanders and their congregation members. Tanya Flanders strategically controlled her family's image and reputation within the church so well that even years after Marie's disappearance and murder, several members of the congregation past and present could not wrap their heads around it. Many members defended the couple and refused to believe the charges against James Flanders. All over the internet, church members have expressed their anger and hurt at both James and Tanya, and it's intense, to say the least. 

Marie worked in the coffee shop in the church and in October of 2009, Marie moved into the Flanders home. She would have no idea that her life would descend into chaos, and in just two years she would disappear from that same house. But before that, Marie would move out and move in again which was a red flag from the start. It's unclear why, but less than a year after moving into the Flanders home in Florida, Marie moved to Arizona to live with James' parents for a short stint in the summer of 2010. Call me crazy, but I find this strange. I don't understand what would have caused Marie to move to Arizona to live with James' parents, and I don't understand why she didn't stay with her own family or friends...but I have no answers in that arena, so we'll just leave it there. 

According to both James and Tanya, Marie allegedly agreed to act as a surrogate for them while she was living in Arizona. Right from the beginning of this completely twisted saga, I have to say that I'm not sure that Marie truly agreed to be a surrogate or if it was just the cover story for an extramarital affair. The other possibility I've seen mentioned online is that Marie was preyed upon from the start; if you consider that she allegedly accepted financial help from them according to James and was likely also being quote-unquote counseled in her emotional problems, it's quite obvious that the power dynamic between Marie and this couple makes her very indebted to them. 

At most, I might be able to believe that Marie agreed to consider surrogacy. Many women these days provide surrogacy to both gay and straight couples, women who can't have babies, etc. Sometimes it involves a payment agreement and other times it doesn't, it just depends on the circumstances. 

Surrogacy might have been posed as an option to reconcile the debt she owed them; it also might have been supplementary so that she could get on her feet, maybe move out on her own. Who knows how this alleged surrogacy arrangement was proposed by the Flanders, but the why I think is more complex than financial reasons. The implication here was that Tanya was incapable of having another baby because she had multiple miscarriages. She and James have an adult daughter who frankly didn't seem that much younger than Marie. 

But the rumor at the church amongst members of the congregation was that Marie was a single pregnant mother-to-be abandoned by an abusive boyfriend, down on her luck...that the Flanders had taken her in. These church members were referred to as the 'inner circle' by police, and they were with whom Tanya would sew the seeds of doubt about the truth. So if you ask me they were less of an inner-circle and more like the gardeners for Tanya's lies, albeit they certainly believed what they were told and that's not their fault. Later, we're going to learn how this is just a small window into how Tanya's abuse of power in the church would come into play. 

The inner-circle revealed to detectives that Marie was allegedly considering an abortion, but upon discovery of Marie's situation, the couple offered to adopt Marie's baby instead. The arrangement was that Marie would nurse the baby for three months and leave her in the care of the Flanders afterward. The sperm donor was none other than Pastor James. A member of the inner-circle claimed she was told that there was a turkey baster involved, which of course just couldn't have been the cherry on top of this bizarre story of conception. 

Marie's ex-husband told Dateline that he was very direct and asked Marie what the deal was, and she told him that she was acting as a surrogate for James and Tanya, through a form of artificial insemination. So it seems as though Marie herself was sticking to the surrogacy story. 

But then there would be yet another twist in the saga, coming directly from the inner-circle. Tanya disclosed to the group of women another previously unknown piece of information: James and Marie had sex, and Tanya had been okay with it. She told them that they had quote-unquote "done it the old fashioned way." If you recall, Marie was living with James' parents at the time and according to the details in the sheriff's warrant, James had flown to Arizona with the plan of impregnating Marie. 

So here we are again with yet another deviation from the previous versions of the story. This last confession is intriguing because not only is this unbecoming behavior of a couple in church ministry, it's just not normal in general. Surrogacy arrangements are typically made in a much more responsible manner, involving lawyers, counselors, and many couples share this journey with their family and friends. Not in this scenario. 

Keep in mind that this is really sensitive information to be sharing with members of your church congregation. This isn't just gossip, these are really, personal details and Tanya is the one imparting it to the inner-circle through her lens. It doesn't sound like James and Marie had a say in the stories that were spread around, but rather had to play along.

Right away if you're thinking this is train is speeding fast toward disaster, you'd be right. James had gradually begun to introduce material in his sermons that didn't go unnoticed by the congregation, verses from the Old Testament regarding polygamy, almost as if it were some kind of a justification for the situation at hand - and what was that exactly? We're going to get into that, so buckle up. 

As months went by and Marie's pregnancy progressed, it didn't take long for the circumstances to become even more bizarre. According to the warrant, in December of 2010, Tanya and James became concerned when Marie called them to say she was contemplating an abortion. What that tells me is that Marie had her doubts about having the baby, probably because this situation was chaotic, to say the least. But whatever she was going through she managed to overcome, allegedly with the help of a doctor after some convincing by Tanya and James. In April or March, she moved back to Florida and into the Flanders home. 

A baby shower at the church was organized for Tanya...that's right, Tanya, not Marie. There was even a photo taken of Tanya with a balloon under her shirt posing next to Marie which you can see in the Dateline special. The inner-circle at Calvary Emerald Church was sworn to secrecy about what they knew of this seemingly polygamous arrangement. If the word got out that Pastor James was the father of Marie's baby, it could destroy everything that he and Tanya and built together. 

In the 2015 Oxygen special, there's a picture is flashed that appears to be from the birth of baby Grace on July 14 of 2011, where Marie is in an inflatable water birthing tub that people normally put in their living rooms for home water births. Tanya is kneeling behind her with one hand on her forehead and the other on Marie's stomach. It's just so...disturbing considering what follows after the birth of baby grace. 

Three months later on October 19, 2011, several of Marie's family and friends received a hair raising group text message that read:

Yesterday I left Fort Walton Beach. There is something I have been wanting to do for a very long time and there will be no better time than now to do it. I didn't tell any of you what I have been planning or that I was about to leave because you would have probably tried to talk me out of it. I appreciate and love all of you. 

Right away, Marie's family and friends were skeptical that she had written this message. Marie's friend, Kay knew immediately that she hadn't written the text when she wrote to Marie in response: "What about Grace?" and she received a reply of "Grace is in good hands, she is with Tanya and James." Kay Barber is the woman who was a kind of a mother figure 

Kay said that Marie would have never referred to the Flanders as Tanya and James, that she always referred to them instead as 'James and Tanya' so as minute as that may sound to some people, it rang alarm bells in her mind, and it was obvious to a couple of people which included Jeff, her ex-husband and the father of her older daughter Paris. 

Five days later, Jeff told police that the text message's wording didn't sound like Marie's and that he didn't believe she sent it. He was living in Kentucky at the time. He was adamant that Marie never would have left without telling him or her daughter Paris. He had spoken to her only a little more than a week prior, she had talked vaguely about plans for the future and everything had seemed normal. Jeff tried calling and texting her repeatedly with no response, prompting him to call the police and reporter her missing. In this phone call, he did express that in his limited contact with James, the pastor seemed to be very controlling over all aspects of Marie's life. So that's really worrisome, and I think a big red flag. 

Jeff had known Marie really well, and it had to have been alarming for him to realize how tightly controlled she was in this very bizarre situation she was in with the Flanders. And remember Jeff had amicably split with Marie to give her the freedom to find herself away from the responsibilities of marriage, to get her bearings on whatever it was that was probably connected to her prior trauma. 

Now Kay asked the Flanders to report Marie missing, and here's what's interesting...James told Kay that he had a friend in the Sheriff's office who would help him file a report once he knew for sure that Marie hadn't run away to Sweden, where her biological mother lives. So right away James has an excuse for not reporting her missing, and it's quite specific. But even in the days, weeks, months, and years to come James and Tanya never would report Marie missing. 

Esta, Marie’s sister, told investigators the about last time she had seen Marie, which was about four days before the group text message was sent. They spent the day together and Marie was in a good mood. She kept showing pictures of baby Grace, and it appeared obvious to Esta that Marie was in love with James. So this is an issue. Because if Marie was truly just a surrogate, being in love James would perceivably be out of bounds. This man was married to Tanya and presenting the image of traditional monogamous marriage to his congregation. The two women made plans to see each other the next weekend with Esta later receiving a text message from Marie with a photo with the two of them from the day they spent together, saying "it was so awesome to hang out with you today! Love you."

Initially, Esta didn't even realize that the group text message was from Marie because she wasn't the type of person to send group texts. Esta expressed that despite what the text message implied, Marie would have never let anything prevent her from doing what she wanted to do. She also refused to believe that Marie would stop contacting Paris, or leave Grace. 

It makes me wonder if this may have been the reason Marie ended up living with James' parents in Arizona after originally having moved in with James and Tanya. If a budding romance (and believe me I want to throw up saying this) but if Tanya had discovered a budding romance between Marie and James, I could see it causing her to demand that Marie get out of her house. Maybe she wouldn't want to leave Marie without a place to stay, so giving her the option of staying with James' parents might have been the alternative to being publicly shamed to the congregation. I don't know, I'm just thinking through ideas. 

But when detectives interviewed the Flanders three days later after Jeff had reported Marie missing, Tanya told them more details about the alleged conception of the baby. She claimed that all parties were in agreement with the surrogacy. She even said that she was present, in the room, while Marie and James drank sake and had sex. I'm not here to say people don't have their voyeuristic inclinations or kinks, whatever, but that's not how this cookie is crumbling.

So, I’m sorry this is where I roll my eyes. Because this would mean that Tanya allegedly traveled with James to Arizona, to be present in the room, sober, according to Tanya, while James impregnated Marie. I'm calling bullshit. I know some people might be willing to entertain the idea that maybe, perhaps, Tanya forced herself to witness James and Marie have sex and wanted a baby so badly that she made an effort to be desensitized to the act...I don't know, I think this is just completely made up. 

I thought it sounded like she was trying to convince herself that this is what had taken place, too, when watching the clips of her in interviews with the police, she's proclaiming that "sex is not a relationship. A relationship is two people coming together...sex is just an added bonus." I mean that just sounds like something you'd tell yourself, or maybe something the cheater would say to reassure their spouse. 

I don't believe for a second that Tanya could handle being in the room. I don't think she was there...I think Marie originally was banished to Arizona upon Tanya learning of an affair between her and James. Because of their reputation of being a kind and generous couple, I don't think that they had the heart to turn Marie out onto the streets but instead opted to move her to Jame's parent's home. When Marie found out she was pregnant, she was propositioned with the idea of giving her baby to Tanya and James. So in other words, James and Tanya would adopt baby Grace. 

Maybe that way James and Tanya could deal with their marriage with Marie out of the picture, and without the guilt of having removed her from their home. They could work on their relationship and avoid the embarrassment of the affair reaching the ears of their church congregation. But if Marie discovered she was pregnant shortly after, this would explain this completely bullshit story about how Tanya and James allegedly flew to Arizona to arrange a budget surrogacy conception arrangement. 

A woman named Garnet Vota, a close friend of Tanya's and member of the inner circle was interviewed extensively by police. She had acted as a midwife to Marie during Grace's birth and it was at her house that the baby was born. She revealed the pregnancy was not planned, but that the Flanders didn't want the baby aborted. Garnet was one of the women in the inner circle to whom some of the details of this entire situation were leaked, by Tanya. 

Eventually, Tanya told Garnet she and Marie were "sister-wives" and that they were in fact in a polygamous relationship with James. But it was obvious to Garnet that Tanya and Marie weren't getting along despite the plan to go on living as a family after the baby was born.

Tanya claimed in her interview with investigators that Marie was overjoyed that they would raise the baby together. But of course, this narrative wouldn't be complete without a creative twist from Tanya. She says that as time went on, whenever the subject of adoption was brought up to  Marie it would cause her to withdraw. I don't know how much I believe this. I'm not sure I think that Marie had ever entertained the idea of adoption. Of course, it's impossible to know because we only have Tanya's word. My instinct is telling me that adoption is something I think that was floated around by Tanya and James. But of course, I could be completely wrong, it may have been something she considered at first...however, I don't really buy that Marie would have been enthusiastic about it. 

Later, Tanya's friend Garnet would recall a conversation years later in a 2015 interview with police that she'd had with Marie while they were working together in the church coffee shop. According to Garnet, Marie said that she wanted James for herself but that she knew that it would be difficult to pull off. So because this was disclosed years after Marie's disappearance, I feel like this information should be taken with a grain of salt. 

Why this information didn't come out sooner I don't understand. It seems like this would really important to mention, but it didn't reach investigators until later. Suspect, if you ask me...and we're going to examine why as we go along. With this backdrop and these circumstances in mind, let's get into nitty-gritty details of Marie's disappearance because we've got a lot more ground to cover. 

According to the warrant, James claimed that Marie had been going through a noticeable decline since giving birth to Grace, described as a 'downward spiral.' He claimed that although Marie had been to a doctor, she refused to take her medication.

Now, I do want to pause for a second to say that this isn't unusual for people who struggle with mental illness. Many times people who are prescribed medication go through cycles of taking their medication, not taking it, for different reasons. Marie could have been not taking it because she was breastfeeding, who knows if she had even been taking it throughout her pregnancy. There are medications, different mood stabilizers that can be swapped out to eliminate harm to the fetus depending on the patient and their circumstances. However, there isn't a whole lot of research on pregnant Bipolar mothers...so we could end up finding out down the road that it's been undertreated, mistreated, etc. 

So anyway, this is important because this information about Marie's Bipolar is used very strategically in Marie's disappearance to turn the attention away from the Flanders. I felt that in reading about this case, the behavior of the Flanders is presented in the media as mostly religious zeal and an eagerness to live this risky 'alternative' polygamous lifestyle. I think that James and Tanya were quite smart in how they were able to manipulate Marie and they had had enough practice by the time she'd disappeared that there was already an elaborate story prepared as an explanation. 

James told police that on October 17, 2011, that he faked being sick to stay home and take care of the baby. He told Marie to take herself shopping, which he says she did at around 9:30 or 10:00 a.m. James said that Marie had been behaving 'differently' and that she was talking about taking an all-day trip. When she returned hours later, he states that she went straight to her room to take a nap. 

Allegedly, Tanya had returned home from church Marie was still sleeping. James told Tanya that Marie appeared to be quote-unquote 'down' so like, she was sad or upset. The baby began to get antsy so Tanya decided to take the baby with her while she went shopping. She claims that she went to Target, and some other places she couldn't recall but at some point ended up at a Bealls Outlet in Destin. 

A few hours later around 6 to 7 pm, James said that Marie woke up from her nap and they had a conversation in the kitchen. According to James, Marie talked about how she wanted to raise her other daughter, Paris, with Jeff. James told Marie that she needed to take care of herself first. Now he claims that this made Marie upset, and she no longer wanted to talk. 

The warrant says that Tanya initially told investigators James had called her while she was out shopping to tell her about his conversation with Marie, and about how she needed to quote 'fix herself first' before making decisions about Paris' upbringing. James says that he went running in the neighborhood, presumably to clear his head is the implication...where he ran to a Bealls Outlet a little less than 2.5 miles away. According to Tanya, she spoke with James on the phone her entire trip back home, picking him up about a block away from their home. I think this detail is strange. Like why pick him up at all? Anyways... 

Upon arriving home between the hours of eight and eight-thirty, Tanya and James said that Marie and her white pickup truck were both gone. James claims that he tried to text Marie but received no response. The next day, he tried to call her but she didn't answer. James says that she finally responded to him by text with "I'm okay" on the same day that Marie allegedly had sent the group text message to all her family and friends saying that she was leaving Fort Walton Beach. The warrant shows that these text messages would be less than 15 minutes apart. 

Exactly one day before Marie would have sent this mass group text message, a Fort Walton Beach Police Officer ran the plate of a white truck located in the parking lot of a Chevron Gas station. Coincidentally, or so it seems, this white pickup truck was located close by to the Bealls Outlet where Tanya had picked up James the day before. The officer didn't see anyone in it or around it, the doors were unlocked. He hadn't seen it before that night, and he didn't see it again after.

During the initial interview with police, James presented a receipt explaining that he and Tanya had discovered Marie's pick up in long term parking at the Northwest Florida Regional Airport two days after she would have allegedly sent the group text. The receipt James handed to Investigator Matz documented Marie's truck entering long term parking on October 18, the day before the group text was sent, and leaving on the 21st.

Additionally, an interview with the Flander's neighbor revealed that Marie's truck had been in the driveway the day after her supposed disappearance with James' motorcycle parked behind it. That morning, the same neighbor had received a text message from James requesting heavy prayers. So if we track the journey of her truck, that means through the 18th to the 21st, her truck was moved from the Chevron gas station to the Flanders residence, and then to the long term parking lot at the airport. 

In an interview with Tanya in early November just about two weeks after Marie's disappearance, she talks about how she and James noticed Marie's medication and gun were missing. Marie had kept this firearm from her time as a booking officer in Colorado. In this same interview, Tanya reiterated as she would in others, that Marie never changed her mind about the arrangement with Grace. This is something that she doubles down on throughout the years, and it's important for later so we'll make a mental note of it right here. 

The investigation began to take a dark turn upon discovery that James had contacted a close friend named Eric who had agreed to meet with him after lunch, but James was so anxious that he had shown up at his workplace. Eric described James as being distraught and in a panic. Apparently, James wanted to get out of the country, either by boat or by plane and he wanted Eric's help, but he refused, and instead started questioning him. Eric had heard about Marie's disappearance in the days prior. According to Eric, James said quote 'it's really bad, it's really bad, I need to get out of the country" and eluding to the idea that something had happened to Marie. Eric then asked if he was the father of Marie's baby, and James admitted that he was. James just kept saying over and over again "it's so bad, it's so bad." But when Eric would push him to tell him more, James would say "I just can't tell you." So this is ominous, to say the least. 

Eric happened to know that James carried a gun with him. And this I find quite interesting...a pastor who carries, I'd sooner expect that out in the midwest or somewhere like Texas but this just goes to show you how much I know about guns. Of course, Florida has a healthy and thriving gun enthusiast community, I was just caught off guard that a pastor would carry. Concerned for James' mental state, Eric asked for his gun and James gave it to him. 

After contacting a mutual doctor friend, all agreed that James should be admitted to the hospital under the Baker Act. So for those who aren't familiar with the Baker Act, it's a law that allows for emergency psychiatric admission for people who might hurt themselves or others. There's a 72-hour hold where the patient is given a mental health evaluation, and this can be ordered by law enforcement, judges, doctors, etc. James voluntarily stayed at the hospital for ten days. So who knows if this is to buy himself some time so he could figure out his next move, or a way to set up the probability of a case for temporary insanity...maybe a diagnosis of depression could be a convenient scapegoat in the future. 

Now during this time, Tanya had come to the Criminal Investigation Division office for an interview, but she never once disclosed that James was under the Baker Act even after she was asked when he could attend a follow-up interview. That in and of itself I think really speaks volumes. I don't think that Tanya wanted it getting out to anyone and certainly not the police. I'm sure it was humiliating enough for Tanya that mutual friends within the church were already aware that something was going on between the Flanders and Marie that was unraveling before their very eyes.

The investigation began to uncover important clues that the Flanders were omitting. A police interview with Jason Anderson, a youth pastor at the church, revealed that he had no knowledge of the true nature of the Flanders relationship with Marie. That is, until the day that James was admitted to the hospital under the Baker Act. Jason said that Tanya came into his office and said quote "We made some decisions we regretted, and James is the father of Marie's baby. James was in the hospital and he left here with the intention of going somewhere and killing himself."

Be sure to catch the rest of this story in part 2, Episode 4, coming up next on Project Sunlight.

References

Other

Episode 3: The Disappearance of Rachel Mellon Skemp - Pt 2.


1*u51tSwCvOQ1ZtglfgwsYWw@2x.jpeg

About this episode:
Project Sunlight host, Rissa, talks about the nearly 24 year long disappearance of 13-year-old Filipino American Rachel Mellon Skemp from her home in Bolingbrook, Illinois.

Listen on Apple Podcasts

Show Notes

Director: Andrew K. Smith Producers: Andy Hale & Lisette Guillen Casting: Matt Campbell Score: Samuel A. Ramirez https://www.facebook.com/CSCFChicago https://twitter.com/casefileschi https://instagram.com/casefileschicago


Transcript

RISSA: Hello and welcome to Project Sunlight. This episode is part 2 of The Disappearance of  Rachel Mellon Skemp, so you should really listen to Episode 1 or else this episode won’t make sense. The clip you just heard was Rachel’s best friend Carrie in an episode of Casefiles Chicago. I had to take an extra week to research this case in depth, which meant sifting through digital newspaper archives night after night and piecemealing together the timeline from the few publications that covered Rachel’s case. I am having to research for the database and the podcast whenever I’m able to between work, sleep and eating...so thank you to everyone for your patience and I really appreciate the kind comments, encouragement and enthusiasm. It’s so important that our communities take note of the disappearances and murders of these women because the mainstream media won’t. And yes, every once and a while Filipino women are featured on major news outlets as victims of crime - but rarely. We can’t expect the nuances of our community trauma to be captured in soundbites, although we can expand on it in mediums like this podcast. And that’s what this is for, that’s why we’re here. 

Whether we’re discussing a disappearance or a murder, it’s critical that these Filipina victims are found and brought home wherever that may be, in the diaspora or in the Philippines. Families, friends, loved ones, they need answers, and justice. The name of the podcast comes from the quote by Louis Brandeis, an American lawyer and associate justice on the Supreme Court of the United States from 1916 to 1939.  “Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.”

He was referring to transparency in government and using it as a means to prevent corruption, but it’s a quote that’s been slimmed down to “Sunlight is the best disinfectant” and popularized to encompass a broader idea that shining a light to expose the truth is necessary for remedying what’s been hidden.

I started collecting information to compile into a database on missing and murdered Filipino women in the United States about 5 months ago. I was inspired by the activism surrounding missing and murdered indigenous women to look inward at my own community, noticing with increasing concern that that there was a dearth of information on missing and murdered Filipino Women in the United States. 

Several patterns and commonalities emerged from my research of over 100 murdered and missing Filipinas dating back to 1965. Many Filipina victims of gendered violence had little more than mere mentions of their disappearances or deaths in local newspapers. Compared to more widely publicized crimes that many Americans would know by the name of the perpetrator or victim alone, the stories of Filipinas are riddled with inaccuracies and misspellings of names, often lacking photos, critical background information and in-depth interviews. 

Rachel Mellon Skemp is one of the Filipinas in the database that had more information on her case than several others, but other than the Chicago Tribune, the Daily Herald and mostly local news interviews by Jeff and Carrie, I found very little mainstream media coverage of Rachel’s case. It’s disheartening because we have a thirteen-year-old girl who’s been missing since 1996 and as you’ll hear, there have been significant developments over time but less and less so in recent years. I do think that this case can be solved, but the lack of visibility on Rachel’s case is a major hindrance. I think that mounting public pressure and re-interviewing family and friends could be key to reinvigorating the investigation.

So let’s get into the episode and talk about the details and developments that occurred in the years after Rachel went missing. 

In late August of 1997, Police Cmdr. Richard Darrah, point man in the investigation, says police are working with FBI agents to pursue new leads generated by new information developed in the case, however, police decide against releasing it to the public.

On September 3rd per the Daily Herald, Rachel’s father, Jeff Skemp, received a mysterious message printed in green marker on the blank side of a store-bought sympathy card that he had gotten in the mail that seeming to offer vague clues as to where Rachel’s body might be, it read “I keep 'receiving' a vision of a shoe now burned within walking distance of a park or place where she liked to go meet people her own age, her friends. I think it is or was buried there. The police investigation is not going rightly now but the prevailing opinion they have is correct. Your daughter is very happy, praising God and thanking him in heaven. I know Earthly passing is difficult to take, but know she is exquisitely happy." 

The word receiving is in quotation marks, I don’t really understand why.

The article describes it as an “anonymous card” so it would seem to imply it wasn’t signed...I wonder if there was any handwriting analysis done on this card. That’s one thing I have to say that frustrated me in researching this case, there’s very little information on the forensics but I suppose that could be a strategy on the part of law enforcement in order to keep their cards close to the vest. But I have so many questions about this card that he received, and I haven’t really seen it mentioned anywhere else. Maybe it was a hoax, or a self-professed psychic or a medium...I don’t know, but I find it interesting. 

Another angle that could be considered is that the author may have referred to “receiving a vision” to distance themselves from having maybe heard about Rachel’s disappearance from the person who took her. Were they trying to alleviate a guilty conscience? I think it’s something to ponder. But the fact that it hasn’t really been mentioned in the news articles I’ve found makes me think that this could have been another hoax or a ploy for attention. I hate having to acknowledge that there’s people out there who toy with families of missing persons, unfortunately, many families go through this. Perhaps this person was well-intentioned and and a complete stranger truly believed in their so called vision, but to contact family like this is just crossing the line. 

Anyways...so three years after Rachel’s disappearance on what would have been her 17th birthday, Jeff continued to urge the public to be vigilant in the search for Rachel. 

When I was browsing through public court records for the state of Illinois  I found several references to numerous financial debts that Amy and Vincent had to answer for. Most of the issues seemed to stem from unpaid landlords, there was an apparent foreclosure complaint, forcible entry and detainer complaints which means an occupant is refusing to leave a property even after being given notice. Many of these complaints go back far enough that they honestly seemed to have started really when Amy and Vincent got married, before Rachel went missing. Knowing that there was financial strain and what seems to be like a lot of moving around to different addresses within Illinois, it had to have been really difficult with three children.I’ve never been able to figure out what Vince did for employment, but if he was struggling to keep a job and Amy had to juggle the financial hardship along with the abuse, that’s a lot to bear. 

In the interview with Casefiles Chicago (which by the way is also in the show notes if you’d like to watch it) Carrie talks about how it was really hard to be pulled out of class by investigators to answer questions, to be re-interviewed about Rachel’s disappearance. When you watch her talk about Rachel, you really get the feeling of how heavily this has weighed on her throughout her life. She’s lived without her best friend for longer than she had been alive at the time when Rachel disappeared, remember they were only 13-years-old. That would have been a pivotal time in both of their lives; and I’m sure they had plans, dreams, visions for the future and none of it included being apart from one another. My heart really goes out to her.

In 2000, this is where the case takes a hard turn for the worst. In January, it’s revealed by police that a grand jury has been hearing testimony for nearly two months regarding Rachel’s disappearance, and they now believe that Rachel is a victim of homicide. What prompted this move by law enforcement hasn’t been revealed, but they’ve stated that they do suspect foul play. In 2009, a reporter for the Daily Herald wrote that police revealed Vince had scratches on his body at the time of Rachel’s disappearance, which he said came from working on his car. I would imagine that this would have been observed either the day of or in the days immediately after she went missing, so I’m really curious to know if police took pictures. 

The Daily Herald says that police questioned Vince for 9 hours. Wouldn’t we all love to have been a fly on the wall in that room? Of course, there’s no audio recording or CCTV footage of the interview, but perhaps whatever was discussed was enough to kick things up a notch because police served Vince with a warrant for samples of his blood, hair, and saliva.  Now this really makes me think that perhaps the forensics team found something in the Mellon family home, or perhaps there had been evidence collected from Vince’s car. At this time Amy and Vince were living in Joliet, which is about 45 minutes way from Bolingbrook. What’s strange is that on the very day the warrant was served, Vince and Amy were moving out of the house. So once again, we have likely financial distress and upheaval. 

Law enforcement said that they thoroughly searched the immediate area in Bolingbrook for Rachel and didn’t find anything, but remember, she wasn’t classified as a missing person right away. There’s also the problem of Vince’s account as to how he and Rachel spent the morning together leading up to the afternoon when he allegedly left the house to walk the dog. Let’s just think about the possibility that if Vince isn’t telling the truth, that from the time Rachel hung up the phone with her grandmother at 10:45 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. when her younger sister came home, he had a lot of time in between to make her disappear along with any evidence. 

Now if you’re wondering what Vince’s motive may have been, here’s what hadn’t been publicly known until 2000. Ahead of Amy and Vince’s testimony before the grand jury, law enforcement had obtained a diary of Rachel’s with an entry dating back to August ‘95 just months before her disappearance, revealing that Vince had kissed and touched Rachel inappropriately. She wrote that he had warned her about predators, attempting to show her what quote unquote “shouldn’t happen” until she’s older. Ugh, talk about absolutely repulsive and just inconceivably hypocritical in every way. That must have been absolutely terrifying to have experienced this grown man, her stepfather, touching her and trying to impart this weird message to her about older men...while he’s doing the very thing he’s warning her against? 

It’s just beyond gross and stupid, Rachel had to have been incredulous as to how wrong, how contradictory this was...she was a smart young girl with a good head on her shoulders. In the interview transcript with CNN, Jeff says that Rachel never spoke about this incident. In fact he says that she was so much of a people pleaser, that it’s likely she would have been afraid to say anything at all...and when you consider the previous instances of her being threatened, Amy being abused, it’s not difficult to understand why it was written in her diary. 

In the same interview with CNN, the private investigator that the Mellons hired, Cynthia Georgantas with the cold case unit in the Lemont Police Department talked about how there was a steak knife found underneath Rachel’s bed, and a book titled ‘Daddy’s Kiss’. Whether or not this book was for children I couldn’t determine, it wasn’t anywhere online that I could find. If it was, it could have easily been explained away with two other younger children in the home...however, I believe it points to the possibility that Rachel was being groomed. Knowing this, it’s possible Rachel stashed the knife under her bed for protection. I haven’t heard about anything further on these items, but it’s unclear whether there was DNA evidence on the knife.

I think the most likely scenario based on the facts that we know, is that Rachel was probably attacked during her nap and the pillows, the blue blanket she was wrapped in while sleeping, I think those were disposed of with her in an effort to conceal evidence. And I do agree with law  enforcement that Rachel was a victim of foul play. Vince had at least a few hours to stash Rachel’s body and he might have already had a location in mind if he’d been grooming her as a child. 

I’ve come across a couple posts in forums online, as well as a Medium article stating that Rachel was seen crying at her locker the day before her disappearance in 1996 and refusing to confide in friends, but I’ve never seen this mentioned by Jeff, Carrie, or the private investigator. This leads me to believe that at most it could be an unverified rumor since I’ve never once read about this supposed crying episode at her locker in any news articles, but I’m bringing it up just in case I’m wrong, because I very well could be. What this information would imply is that it’s possible Rachel had something distressing she needed to tell someone that could be critical to filling in the gaps of this case. Perhaps that would also tie in with the fact that she had written down in her diary that Vince touched her inappropriately. But I think it’s dangerous to dwell too much in speculation without the ability to back it up. All I’m saying is to be very critical of any unverified information that’s online because anything that isn’t fact is little more than a red herring in an already frustrating case. 

The grand jury ultimately didn’t hand down any indictments. It’s both Vince and Amy testified before the members of the jury but it’s been kept secret, so I wonder if we’ll ever know what was revealed…other than Vince allegedly took the fifth, meaning he invoked his right to remain silent. Jeff also testified before the grand jury and he afterward he had said that he was really encouraged, so I’m sure this was another really hard thing to go through, watching Vince walk away from this essentially and turn it into a damage control campaign.  I really want to know whether or not the diary was brought up. If the discovery of the knife and the children’s book was brought up, whether or not the history of the restraining order and threats against Rachel in years prior were admissible. 

Amy and Vince held a press conference afterward to proclaim his innocence and to quote unquote set the record straight. I couldn’t find any video but I did find a clipping from the Daily Herald that talked about it, in which Amy said “The police have asked me to buy into their theories and speculation, but I cannot believe it. I know my daughter and I know my husband.” Vince just sat there apparently, emotionless and quiet, making very little eye contact with anyone. Again if you go back and watch the interview with him when Rachel first went missing, he just doesn’t seem sincere...or concerned, at all. 

Apparently both he and Amy each had their own attorneys. Vince’s attorney, John Schrock said that there was nothing to hide. " Vince did however complain to one member of the media saying,”They went out of their way to get me and we still have no promising leads," and “Everybody's out to get me." What’s so ridiculous about this statement is that Vince knows that without evidence of forced entry into the home where they lived at the time, and there was none, the pool of suspects is considerably reduced to just those who would have known Rachel was at home alone. The only other alternative would be a home invader who managed to get lucky by finding an unlocked door and took Rachel without having left behind any evidence and we touched on this earlier in Part 1. The totality of the facts that we have available don’t point to anyone other than Vince Mellon. 

The police department issued a statement in response that they disagreed with the Mellons, that they hadn’t made a rush to judgement and that they’d continue to operate within the parameters of the law.  According to the Mellon family attorneys, Rachel’s case was to be featured on America’s Most Wanted but the police department pulled the plug on it. So this is getting really ugly. I would imagine this had a lot to do with the clash with the police department, but Jeff actually continued to push for the show to air coverage of Rachel’s case in the following years.

Amy accused the Bolingbrook police of mishandling the investigation into Rachel’s disappearance, maintaining that they had focused on Vince as the perpetrator to avoid the embarrassment of admitting to their mistakes. Now Jeff actually had his own criticisms of how the police handled Rachel’s disappearance, but Jeff did not believe in Vince’s innocence. He said in one interview that quote “I just think that Will County's just inept. They [the police] waited a week before they went in the house. They wait too long before they realize the seriousness of the case. They've just got a terrible track record."

Both Vince and Amy were given polygraphs; Amy passed, but Vince failed parts of his. Now of course we know that a polygraph can result in a false positive and often times these days they’re really not indicative of anything other than physiological responses to certain questions. So I don’t know why these tests are still being done but 27 states actually allow their results to be admissible in court. Polygraphs are considered controversial and experts are divided over their legitimacy. Still, I thought I would mention it. Jeff said that he had actually been at the Mellon house after Police had arrived to let them know of the results, and it was then that Vince pulled Amy to the side and told her that they would no longer be cooperating with police.

Jeff states that he found Amy and Vince’s refusal to cooperate with police puzzling. Now I’ve seen online people accuse Amy of conspiring with Vince to cover up what he did to Rachel, and even Jean Cesarez on CNN really grilled Jeff on whether or not he thought she would intentionally cover up for him and he said he would certainly hope not. I do understand the frustration with this case, but I really think that Amy is still a victim here, and I mean a victim of Vince’s continuous manipulation. 

Amy claimed that she and Vince had done everything possible to find Rachel in the years since her disappearance, which included hiring Cynthia Georgantas, a private investigator, and going on stakeouts in other states, probably based on whatever leads were received. Later on Cynthia Georgantas ends up working for Jeff, I’m not sure at what point but she was very up front about her findings and to this day is still working the case. 

A lawsuit was brought against the Bolingbrook Police Department soon after the grand jury testimony, where Amy alleged that police had taken items from her home during an illegal search while she was at work and Vince was in questioning with police. Then, allegedly a private detective discovers that a telephone in the Mellon home was tapped, prompting Vince’s lawyer to say that he wants to know who’s listening in on his client.  Apparently plainclothes officers were spotted entering the house with a black duffle bag. A judge would order the Bolingbrook police to answer as to whether or not other law enforcement agencies might have been the ones to search the home, the Assistant’s State Attorney ended up arguing that this could reveal their secret weapon in the law’s war against crime. Something to that effect. From what I can find the other law enforcement agency is the FBI, and Amy accused them of taking personal photos of Rachel out of her underwear drawer which agents then used when investigating in the Philippines. 

The Philippines National Police circulated Rachel’s photo in case she might have run away there, but I think this is so far fetched. I understand wanting to look into every possibility, however. Later, a judge would end up throwing out Amy’s lawsuit. 

What’s really sad is that Amy actually said she believed Rachel was still alive. She just couldn’t accept that she could be dead. This is a theme with Amy that I would venture is part of Vince’s manipulation, her believing that Rachel is in fact alive and that Vince could have nothing whatsoever to do with it, then with the added fact of his need to control her... it’s really sad. 

In February of 2001, an article in the Chicago Tribune revealed that police hoped a newly elected state’s attorney would review Rachel’s case. Her name had fallen out of the headlines once the grand jury had failed to return an indictment. To Jeff’s relief, the new state’s attorney had been on top of the case and they felt that there was promise in solving it. But what’s so heartbreaking is that at this point, Jeff said he had started to believe he’d never see Rachel again. The Bolingbrook police department stated that they had only circumstantial evidence, and no direct physical evidence to link Vince Mellon to Rachel’s disappearance and murder. However, the police commander hoped that what they had was enough to impanel a new grand jury. 

In April of 2001, Amy claimed that her daughter had called her three times in one night. What would have led Amy to believe that this was in fact Rachel is anyone’s guess because it’s really not mentioned or seemingly verified. I hate to say it but it sounds like yet another cruel hoax. Of course this likely only reinforced Amy’s belief that Rachel was alive, but it’s not clear if she still believes that now.

Jeff continued in his efforts to find Rachel, he established a group of search volunteers and the website rachelfind.com to get the word out and it’s still there today with information about Rachel. On May 25, 2002 in commemoration of National Missing Children’s Day, the city of Bolingbrook dedicated a tree to Rachel in a neighborhood park just steps away from the home where she disappeared, and a time capsule was filled with items from her friends and family that were there in attendance as part of a special ceremony. For those who might not know, burying time capsules involves putting little trinkets or sentimental items into a sealed container into the ground to be dug up by a recipient at a later date, or in this case 100 years.   Rachel’s friends and family wrote messages on it, put some in it I imagine. You can see a video of this ceremony at the link provided in the show notes. 

There’s a plaque at the foot of the tree that reads: “Remembering Rachel, Rachel Marie Mellon Skemp, Missed since January 31, 1996 (Missing from Bolingbrook, present in our hearts). And so this is a place that’s intended for the community to go sit, remember Rachel. 

There’s another curious detail that I have to mention involving the investigation into Rachel’s disappearance, and that is that infamous retired Bolingbrook cop and wife killer Drew Peterson worked on her case. Drew Peterson’s fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, went missing from their Bolingbrook home only six miles away from where Rachel disappeared. If you don’t know anything about Drew Peterson, well, to summarize, he’s a real scumbag as he fooled around on his wives, was abusive, and is in prison for the murder of his third wife. Prosecutors argued that he made the murder of his wife appear to look like an accident. He also solicited someone for $25,000 to kill the prosecutor in the murder trial of Kathleen Savio. 

Stacy Peterson has never been found to this day and unfortunately her family believes that she was murdered as well, but have never given up on finding her remains.There is some online speculation about whether or not Drew Peterson could have dirtied up the investigation, if in fact he had anything to do with helping to conceal the Rachel’s whereabouts. 

However, I think what’s missing in terms of a connection to Rachel’s case is motive. As far as I can tell there’s nothing that indicates that Drew Peterson knew Vince Mellon before Rachel’s disappearance in 1996. Peterson murdered his third wife in 2004, and his third wife presumed to have been also murdered disappeared in 2007. So without any direct evidence that Vince and Drew would have known each other, I don’t how much time anyone should really spend speculating further.

Now Stacy Peterson’s family members have joined Jeff and Rachel’s friends in public press events to call attention to their missing loved ones. And that’s about as much of a connection that I could find...really that they’re in the same club that no one wants to be in, as family members and victims. 

In 2003, Vince Mellon was arrested and booked into the county jail and charged with domestic battery for slapping his teenage son who was 15-years-old at the time. According to the Chicago Tribune, Vince had pushed him and slapped him in front of Amy, who said he was drunk and out of control. Although there weren’t any visible marks on her son and he didn’t receive any medical treatment, she did sign off on the complaint that put him in jail, although he bonded out for $200 days later. Months after, Vince did end up pleading guilty to the charges and he was sentenced to jail time, ordered to attend anger management classes and domestic violence classes. So you can see how Amy was grappling once again with a situation in which Vince was putting his hands on someone, now her son, and continuing the cycle of violence that he had likely started with Amy when they had gotten married.  Their financial troubles also continued, and both were thrown in jail for failure to pay for a one night stay in a motel in 2005. 

In October of that same year, Vince was leaving a strip club when he was involved in a car accident. He apparently was pulling out of the club into the path of an oncoming station wagon driven by a teacher. Upon discovering that he was drunk, police booked him into jail and he was charged with a DUI. He pleaded guilty to the charge but failed to comply with the terms of his sentence. The guy who hit him was actually quite delighted to have been able to put him in jail, and when I say delighted I do mean he was so glad to have put Vince behind bars even for a short amount of time, saying “I was going about the speed limit, maybe 40, when all of a sudden this Suzuki-Jeep knockoff slid into my lane,” “He came out of the Crazy Rock parking lot and I T-boned him." He described Vince as being loaded, not catatonic, but definitely drunk. He even took a shot at the state prosecutor that the police department had been hoping would bring about closure to Rachel’s case by reinvestigating, saying “It just turned out I did (State’s Attorney) Jimmy Glasgow’s work for him, "That’s my claim to fame,” Wilson said. “I put Vince Mellon in the hospital and then in jail.” 

Jeff held a memorial service on the ten year anniversary of Rachel’s disappearance at the church she had grown up attending in 2006. As far as I could tell, neither Amy nor Vince attended this service, I don’t believe they were at the tree dedication in 2002 either. This was a point at which Jeff made it known that he no longer believed Rachel was alive...this memorial that he held seemed to serve as a way for him to cope with that reality. But Jeff was very open about the fact that closure wasn’t possible for him without answers as to what happened to Rachel and what he referred to as the dignity of a Christian burial. It’s so hard watching the coverage of Jeff throughout the years after this point and see the toll that it continues to take. Few people have the ability to continue to push for answers and the more that time passes. Jeff Skemp said he hasn't lost all hope that someone knows something but for whatever reason has remained quiet but he hopes will find the courage to come forward.  

At the memorial in an interview with the Chicago Tribune, Jeff said “As a parent, you always have hopes and daydreams that Rachel is going to come back," he said. "But from the beginning, in the pit of my stomach, in the depths of my heart, I knew she was gone. "It's apparent that Rachel has probably passed away and is no longer with us. I think it's time for us to get together and comfort each other and say goodbye to Rachel, give her a proper send off.”

The police at this point admitted that although leads had slowed down, the case was still open and active. Months later, another private detective by the name of James Miller offered a $30,000 reward  for information that leads directly to the whereabouts and recovery of Rachel Mellon or results in the arrest and conviction of the person responsible for her disappearance. 

By 2009, the Mellon family had moved to Cleveland, Tennessee and avoided the media.. I think that this is quite telling; whether the Mellons were struggling beyond their means to survive that they had to move, or Vince wanted his family far from Illinois and the air of suspicion around him, if you’re hoping that a missing family member will come home I can’t imagine moving away from the area.  Now she likely really didn’t have a choice in the matter, because remember this is a woman who is very conditioned to abuse. And that abuse is not just going to be physical, it is verbal, it is mental, it is emotional, it is spiritual. 

In March of 2009  Will County State's Attorney James Glasgow pushed for a legislative measure that would allow a judge at a pretrial hearing in a murder case to determine whether so-called hearsay evidence - testimony or documents that quote someone secondhand who is not in court - may be admitted at trial. This would impact the prosecution of suspected murderers in cases like Rachel’s in which authorities say they strongly suspect foul play but are limited by a lack of physical evidence without a body.  Prosecutors would have to prove in a pretrial hearing those statements are reliable and that the defendant's wrongdoing made the witness unavailable to testify. Glasgow encouraged the police departments to review unsolved murder cases to see if the new proposal would apply. This is all according to an article I read from the Daily Herald; I really have to credit these reporters for being the few following this case so in depth over the years. I couldn’t have put the episodes together without this information so really big ups to them.

Jeff was really hoping that this legislation would be able to bring some measure of closure to his daughter’s case, saying quote "To me," he said, "It would be a wonderful blessing if anything ever happened." But nothing did happen. And that’s another one of the many many things that just drives me nuts about this case.

The law did pass and Glasgow was able to successfully use hearsay statements in the Drew Peterson murder trial for his third wife, Kathleeon Savio, made by Stacy Peterson, Drew’s fourth wife, from witnesses to whom she had confided. Which is absolutely incredible if you think about the fact that poor Stacy is still missing, never found, but it’s her words that sealed Drew’s fate in the trial of his previous wife’s murder. Now, that was not to say that it passed easily or without a fight. Glasgow actually had to appeal the judge’s decision in that case to prohibit eight out of fourteen statements of hearsay evidence. But it was reported that Glasgow had to ask the Judge to disregard the legislation that he passed in favor of the state’s common law because it imposed a reliability requirement that was more restrictive to prosecutors than it was helpful. So it wasn’t even the legislation that really helped to get the hearsay statements admitted in the trial as evidence. 

Full disclosure and disclaimer, I’m not a lawyer...but it would appear that Rachel’s diary entry alone must not have been enough evidence to convict Vince Mellon. Even with the other circumstacial evidence consider and the warrant for Vince’s DNA with the predication being murder, it seems to still not be enough. And I don’t know why. 

One question I have is whether or not Rachel’s been declared legally dead. I would think that after nearly 24 years of her never surfacing and zero evidence that she could even be alive that she would be, but perhaps the absence of her remains prevents it. 

Vince and Amy stayed married; the last anyone really heard from them was from the 2009 article I quoted earlier about the hearsay evidence, in which Vince said in a phone interview from Tenneseee, "We've been through an awful lot...we appreciate you keeping Rachel's name out there and to keep the story going in the news, but we have nothing to say. They (the police) pretty much put us through hell and high water.” 

I think it’s telling that it’s Vince who seems to think he has had the last word...Amy has not spoken to the media in years, perhaps not even since the press conference in which she defended Vince and proclaimed his innocence. I don’t think she really gets a choice in that regard and it’s been that way ever since Vince told her they wouldn’t be cooperating with police and their press conference years earlier in which Amy had to act as his spokesperson. But his ego clearly couldn’t let the media have the last word and so he spoke out, but only in an effort to absolve himself of the blame he so resents. 

Now as more years passed and there were breaks in cold cases, Jeff  has really tried to remain hopeful. But the lurching rollercoaster of each discovery of remains in the state of Illinois has been hard on him, it’s not what anyone wants to hope for whatsoever...he has always said that he’ll never stop holding onto a small sliver of hope that remains she could miraculously surface alive. He knows it’s not likely, but I saw him mentioned in articles regarding the three women in Cleveland, Ohio who were rescued after years of captivity and torture. But we’re talking apples to oranges here and unfortunately I just don’t think it’s remotely possible. 

Since then, there’s been next to no movement in Rachel’s case. In 2016, Cynthia Georgantas appealed to the public through the media for leads on a classmate named Autumn, someone purported to be another friend of Rachel’s who may have some important information that could impact the case. What this information could be has never really been disclosed, we have to remember that in quote unquote “no body” cold cases, the odds are typically stacked against prosecutors to provide evidence so they have to be vigilant about the information released to the public. Double jeopardy prevents the repeated trying of the accused on the same charges, so there’s only once chance to get it right. 

There was yet another memorial in 2016 to mark Rachel’s disappearance, this time to mark the 20th anniversary and to once again bring to the attention of the public that this case has still not been solved. The retired lead detective and now Village of Diamond Mayor Terry Kernc spoke at the memorial and through tears according to the Chicago Tribune, called it quote, "The biggest disappointment and failure of my life.”  "Somebody knows what happened to Rachel," said Kernc, "For the sake of the family, they need to come forward."

There’s no news as to whether or not Autumn has been located or has made contact with investigators. Just recently on what would have been Rachel’s 34th birthday, Jeff Skemp, Carrie and others gathered at Rachel’s tree to once again mark another of life she would have lived, had it not been interrupted. I would imagine that should yet another January 31st come to pass without any information on Rachel’s case, there could be another memorial to signify her disappearance on that cold wintery night almost 24 years ago. But Jeff has had a hard time holding these memorials over the years and he’s not the one that needs reminding, he remembers that every day. He’s told media that he had imagined her as a college graduate, and maybe one day, a teacher.

It’s indisputable that Rachel’s life and her future was stolen from her. My opinion is that Rachel is out there somewhere, but without anyone coming forward with new information or a lead, I don’t think we can count on a confession from Vince. And as for Amy or Rachel’s siblings, I think listeners and critics of the Mellons really need to put their emotions aside and consider that a very real danger likely still exist; decades of abuse doesn’t just resolve on its own, or even with time unless all the right circumstances are in place. If and until that happens, it’s likely we won’t get those answers.

But what’s important to remember now is that the more people know about Rachel’s case, the more the public can exert pressure to continue investigating. The only way that works is if community upholds the efforts to remember Rachel’s face and maintain the fight for justice. Anyone with information about  Rachels’ disappearance is urged to call the Bolingbrook Police Department at: 630-226-0600 or you can even contact the private investigator that is still working this case to this day, at : (630) 243-6100. Her family deserves answers.


References

News Articles

  • https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/naperville-sun/ct-nvs-rachel-mellon-missing-memorial-st-0203-20160131-story.html

  • https://www.chicagotribune.com/investigations/chi-childabduct-rachel-skemp-story-archive-story.html

  • https://www.chicagotribune.com/suburbs/ct-bol-rachel-mellon-missing-tl-0128-20160126-story.html

Other

  • https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/usedtobedoe/mellon-rachel-m-january-31-1996-t5228-s10.html

  • http://charleyproject.org/case/rachel-marie-mellon

Episode 2: The Disappearance of Rachel Mellon Skemp - Pt.1


rachelinpink2.jpg

About this episode:
Project Sunlight host, Rissa continues the discussion about the nearly 24 year long disappearance of 13-year-old Filipino American Rachel Mellon Skemp from her home in Bolingbrook, Illinois.

 

Show Notes

 
fepl5gvddkvq5uxz9s4scwmvw820tsm.jpeg

Transcript

RISSA: Hello and welcome to the second episode of Project Sunlight. I want to take the time to say thank you to everyone who took note of the premiere and offered me their support. It really means a lot to me, all the comments, likes, shares and the feedback I’ve been getting...so again, thank you.

I have a quick self-correction I want to make; in the previous episode, I mentioned that a link would be in the show notes at projectsunlightpodcast.com, which is wrong but I hope you’ll forgive me as it was really late at night. The podcast’s website is www.projectsunlightpodcast.net. It might have gone right over the heads of many listeners since I got it right in the closing message, but I just wanted to go ahead and correct myself to avoid any future confusion. 

This episode is based on a case that has stayed with me ever since I began researching it. Unlike in our previous episode where there was limited information on the victim outside of what was gleaned by local reporters, this case is packed with important details, though questions still remain. Keeping this in mind, there’s still far too little mainstream media attention on the disappearance of Rachel Mellon Skemp, but I was able to rustle up the audio clip that you just heard from local news station Chicago WGN9. Thankfully, Rachel’s family and friends have maintained a website that has several home video clips of Rachel, as well as a gallery of pictures and I will link this in the show notes. Rachel Mellon Skemp has been missing for 24 years, so as you can imagine there’s a lot of ground for us to cover. I wanted to let everyone know that because of the amount of immersion we’ll need to do to get into this case; this is Part 1 and the next episode will be Part 2. 

Okay, let’s dive in.

Rachel Mellon Skemp was 13-years-old at the time of her disappearance in Bolingbrook, Illinois on January 31, 1996. She stood at a petite 5’2, 78lbs.  Rachel was born during the early morning hours of Tuesday, October 13, 1982 in Melrose Park, Illinois to Amy and Jeff Skemp. So her 37th birthday was just a few days ago at the time of this recording  She was described as having a permanent smile etched on her face and this is really apparent by nearly all of the pictures there are of Rachel. Almost every picture that exists of Rachel features her signature smile, long dark hair and hazel eyes and golden brown skin. I read a comment from a neighbor in an article where the neighbor described her as a “young Vanessa Williams.” Although I doubt some of my younger listeners would know her music now, she’s known for a song called “Save The Best for Last”, “Colors of the Wind” in Disney’s Pocahontas, but also for being the first black Miss America in 1983. 

Anyways…

Rachel was described as a goofy, bubbly and creative child. She loved animals, science, nature, recycling...and she was known for being really creative. She was quirky and loved to write short stories. One clip of her on the Rachelfind.com which is the website maintained by her family that I referred to earlier, features Rachel playing a guitar while perched on a stool in front of her class, giggling at herself for making a mistake while plucking the strings to “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star.” In all the other home video tape clips of Rachel, you can see how lively and magnetic her personality truly was. There’s actually one video clip of Rachel 11 days before her disappearance where she sports shorter hair and dangly earrings and it’s just absolutely tragic see how obviously loved she was and still is, you can really just feel the warmth of her personality come through the screen in all of the pictures and video.

Both of Rachel’s parents were youth leaders at their local baptist church which Rachel would also attend later, becoming popular herself in youth group. At the age of three, Rachel’s parents separated and this is when she moved to Bolingbrook, Illinois which is just 30 miles outside of Chicago. Rachel’s mother Amy would marry a man named Vincent Mellon or ‘Vince’ and go on to have two other children, Rachel’s half-siblings. I’ve seen a few people online question why Rachel is known as Rachel Mellon Skemp as opposed to being just Rachel Skemp, but really it’s not all uncommon for children to take the names of step parents. In this case I’d say it was really just a matter of not having a completely different last name from her mother, brother and sister. The Mellon family would live together at 612 Melissa Drive in Bolingbrook. 

Rachel was a seventh grader at Bernard J. Ward Middle School at the time of her disappearance. She was apart of a group of close knit friends, one of them being her best friend Carrie Scaglione, who has been outspoken and passionate to this very day about finding Rachel ever since she went missing in 1996. Carrie was interviewed along with Rachel’s father Jeff in a 2016 episode of Case Files Chicago where she talks about how she and Rachel met in middle school through a mutual friend. The girls had lots of classes together, they immediately clicked and Carrie describes her as an old soul, a fan of the Beatles and how Rachel would join her family on weekend camping trips.

Rachel was an A student, and even from a young age she would babysit the neighbor’s children and would help them with their own schooling by teaching them how to read and making practice quizzes. She was also entrusted with babysitting her younger siblings, which is fitting for the oldest child and especially one that is so mature for her age. As I was doing research on Rachel’s life for this episode, I couldn’t help but be impressed more than once with how much this young girl took on at her age. 

Even though Rachel had been missing for 20 years at that time, it was still very apparent how deeply Rachel’s disappearance had impacted Carrie. Just watching Carrie become emotional when talking about Rachel is really heartbreaking. Carrie is definitely one of those friends for life, and you can see this in how involved and vocal she has been in Rachel’s disappearance throughout the years. 

There was trouble in the Mellon household but it didn’t start with Rachel’s disappearance, it had actually started many years prior. Shortly after the summer of 1990 when Rachel was baptized at the church where her parents had been youth leaders, there was a physical altercation between Amy and Vince. At this time Rachel would have been around 8-years-old. Amy accused Vince of pushing her down a flight of stairs and making verbal threats against Rachel. Amy filed a police report and restraining order, but eventually it was dropped and she got back together with Vince. 

Then in 1995, Rachel ran away from home for 12 hours and slept outside of other best friend’s house, Jenny. She was apparently afraid of being blamed for something that her siblings had broken. Rachel eventually called her step-grandparents to pick her up and she returned home. 

It would appear that the Mellons were dealing with more than just your average family problems, and eventually, as with many other cases, the pattern of domestic violence only escalates with time. It’s actually quite common for women to return to their abusers, and this is a result of whole body, mind, and soul conditioning...I don’t say that lightly. We’ll get into more of this in Episode 3 Part 2, but I did want to bring this up because Rachel’s mother has gotten a lot of flack for quote unquote “allowing” Vince to treat her and her oldest daughter this way. Later on, I do think that there is justifiable frustration at how Amy and Vince handled Rachel’s disappearance, but before we go down that road in Episode 2 I do want to say one thing. And before I get pushback, I wanted to talk a little bit about why Amy would stay in her marriage...not in an effort to excuse it, I think that was and still is a dangerous mistake and I I think most listeners will agree. But it’s important to separate emotions and look at facts when considering the circumstances that I believe lead to Rachel’s disappearance. 

It’s extremely difficult for a woman to leave an abuser, and in the research I’ve come across I discovered that a woman will leave her abuser on average 7-8 times before she can successfully get away from her abuser. When a woman is leaving her relationship, this is the most dangerous time. And while I understand that there is a lot of frustration in this case, leaving an abusive relationship is not a cake walk and I want to make it clear that this podcast is not going to be in the business of finger pointing at victims of abuse.

Additionally, I also want to mention that it’s Rachel’s mother who is a 1st generation Filipino, Rachel being 2nd, which means that Amy is a native of the Philippines while Rachel was born here in the United States. If you listened to Episode 1 on the murder of Karen Santillan Tait, you’ll hear me talk about how the differences between 1st and 2nd generation Filipinas are can be so stark that it significantly impacts the way in which they ask for help. 1st generation Filipino women have a number of obstacles to overcome when they immigrate to America; there can be language barriers, they’re often missing the safety network of friends and family because they’re all the way back home in the Philippines and as a foreigner they may be unfamiliar with the way that our criminal justice system works.

There’s also a very real cultural stigma associated with divorce that 1st generation Filipinas may be seeking to avoid; it’s illegal to divorce your spouse in the Philippines. The Philippines is a country that is 80% Catholic, so although Amy was technically a member of the First Baptist Church of Bolingbrook like Jeff, the cultural implications of divorce likely stayed with her and might also be a factor in how she handled the abuse in her marriage.

There’s a study I linked to in the shownotes of Episode 1 that I referenced which describes how these barriers play a significant role in whether or not a 1st generation Filipina will seek help, and I’ll link it again in this episode’s shownotes.The research findings state that 2nd generation Filipino American women are more likely to seek out the resources available to them locally like domestic abuse support groups, counseling, and legal services in order to safely leave an abusive relationship. We’ll circle back on this point in part 2 and how that relates to Rachel’s disappearance. 

So now let’s get into Wednesday, January 31st, 1996, the day Rachel disappeared. It was extremely cold, -20 degrees outside to be exact and it was frigid. There was still snow on the ground. Rachel had stayed home from school with a sore throat, and her stepfather Vince was at home with her as he was unemployed. Why? I couldn’t figure out, I could find any information whatsoever as to what kind of job he’d held.

 At 10:45 a.m. Rachel made a phone call to her paternal grandmother in Texas, Lucy Skemp, after receiving a letter from her in the mail. It was only a 4-5 minute phone call, but according to the transcript of a CNN interview with the private investigator that was hired by Jeff, Cynthia Georgantas, Rachel got very quiet which prompted her grandmother to ask, “Is he there?” And Rachel said “Yes.” She hung up shortly after,  and according to her grandmother this phone call seemed normal. I think we can infer that her grandmother was referring to Vince, of course, although not much else really explains why Rachel had to interact this way with her grandmother other than a few articles that claim that she was quote unquote “not allowed” to talk to her grandparents in Texas. I couldn’t really find out why in my research, but it could be attributed to generalized divorce tensions since Amy married Vince, or if they knew about the abuse in the Mellon household and the threats made toward Rachel. 

Vince says he and Rachel spent the rest of the morning and afternoon playing video games, after which Rachel took a nap. He then says that he took the family’s white German Shepherd, Duke, for a walk at 2:30 p.m. leaving the door unlocked. During the walk, Vince says that Duke slipped out of his collar to chase a rabbit. Interestingly enough, detectives couldn’t find any witnesses to back up Vince’s claim that he had been out walking the dog in the neighborhood. Vince said that he figured the dog would find his own way home which I just think is absurd. It was absolutely freezing cold that day and leaving the family dog out in that temperature German Shepherd or not, if it’s too cold for you it’s too cold for them. 

According to Vince he had returned 30 minutes later after leaving, which would 

put him arriving home at 3:00 p.m. So he left at 2:30 p.m. the dog gets loose, and he returns 30 minutes later? That’s very little time for him to have been walking the dog, for the dog to have gotten loose and if he had spent any time whatsoever looking for Duke, well...he didn’t spend all that long looking for him did he? I mean these are just things I’m thinking out loud when looking at the timeline, it really is just completely stupid already. He’s not a good liar. 

It was 15 minutes later when Rachel’s younger sister came home that she noticed Rachel wasn’t in her room. It until after Amy returned home from work at 5:00 p.m. and was told by Rachel’s sister that she was missing that things started to finally get rolling. Okay and now let’s also point out that for an hour and 45 minutes Vince was doing...what? Apparently not looking for Rachel. He actually told one reporter for ABC7 Chicago that he didn’t search the neighborhood for her either. He said, “I didn't really look around the neighborhood as far as thinking you know something might be suspicious. So, I didn't know what to say other than I didn't notice anything out of the ordinary at that point.”

So you’ve got the family dog missing and now Rachel is not in her room, and he didn’t check on her this entire time. Vince didn’t search for either one of them, and here he is at home...I mean this is just absolutely unbelievable. 

It truly is a crock of shit. 

Now by 5:30 p.m. Amy called the police to report Rachel missing. Presumably between 5:00 and 5:30 she had called Rachel’s friends like Carrie and Jenny to see if anyone knew where she was, because Carrie talks about how she came home from school that day and found out from her parents that Rachel was missing on Casefiles Chicago. And she told her parents that she hadn’t seen or heard from Rachel, she’d been at school and then to volleyball practice. Carrie called Rachel’s mom right away to find out what was going on and to let her know that she hadn’t seen Rachel since the day before. And I can’t imagine how stressful that must have been at 13 to have to tell Amy’s mom that she really didn’t know anything, I mean Rachel had been at home sick. Then to have to hang up and try to sit down at the dinner table knowing your best friend is missing, you can just progressively see the trauma in Carrie’s voice and body language as she’s talking about this in the interview with Casefiles Chicago and you can’t help but feel it too.I do recommend that everyone watch and share it, it doesn’t cover every detail in the case but since it’s one of the few videos out there on Rachel’s case people should share it on social media as much as possible, please. Don’t forget it’s in the show notes at projectsunlightpodcast.net, grab the link there and post it on Facebook. 

So after calling the police, Amy claimed that it took them an hour to arrive at her home...which is alarming. I don’t know what the standard protocol is supposed to be in terms of the response to a missing person’s report it might even vary depending on who’s in the immediate area, but an hour does seem like a lot. At some point, Jeff’s father and Rachel’s grandfather, Ken Skemp, had been notified that Rachel was missing and he was the one to let Jeff know when he came over; they lived in the same apartment complex and at this time Jeff was living in Dallas, Texas and he was working for a cellphone warehouse.

In the midst of all this, a real estate appraiser who was in the Mellon’s neighborhood on business at some point had found the family dog, Duke. Duke must not have gone far because a neighbor recognized him and told the man that he belonged to the Mellon family, and he was returned. I don’t think this is a coincidence, and I couldn’t find anywhere that stated when exactly the dog was brought back, but the indication that I get is that he wasn’t missing for long. So again, it’s doubtful Vince even bothered to look for the dog before returning home a half-hour after leaving to walk him.

One of the biggest red flags in this case that’s an important detail is that the blue blanket she had been sleeping with and two pillows were also missing from her bedroom. Rachel’s winter jacket and boots were still there, as well as her purse. In one article that I read by the Chicago Tribune, Amy remarked that Rachel hadn’t been wearing her favorite jewelry because it was still there in her room. Rachel was wearing pajamas according to the reports I’ve read, a pink sweatshirt, yellow sweatpants and red slippers. So if she left her jewelry behind, the implication is that she had been in those same clothes when she went missing. 

So if she’s not in the house, she doesn’t have her winter clothing or her purse, and she’s presumably in pajamas and slippers...why would she leave those things behind if she were going somewhere? In below zero temperatures? 

It’s completely implausible.

Well it doesn’t get any better, unfortunately, because according to Amy police told her that they wouldn’t take any action for another 24 hours. Having to wait 24 hours before investigating this disappearance when you have a 13-year-old girl missing in sub zero degree weather with no coat, no boots, no purse...she wouldn’t have had a cellphone as this was 1996 and children in those days wouldn’t have had cell phones like they do now...those 24 hours would have been absolutely crucial to finding Rachel. According to Jeff in his interview with Casefiles Chicago Police told him that Amy had probably just left with one of her friends. 

Even if she had left with a friend, neither of her two best girlfriends knew where she was, and according to Rachel’s family her circle of friends were all very close. And the one and only time Rachel had ever run away, she left a note explaining why. Still, the days went by with no sign of Rachel, no phone calls to anyone she was close to, there was apparently no activity on her bank account so she hadn’t used her debit card.  

On Saturday, Jeff flew into Illinois from Texas, to help look for Rachel. In the CNN interview transcript that I found from February 2011, Jeff says that when he asked Vince where Rachel was, Vince just said “I was out, and when I came back she was gone." He said, "Somebody came in and snatched her.” Jeff says that at the time he really wanted to take Vince at his word because he didn’t have all the facts...but he did find it suspicious. And with good reason, I mean I know that they’ve been frantically looking all over and calling around but why assume someone came in snatched her? Someone would have to know she was home alone, or be prowling the neighborhood looking for unlocked doors. In the middle of the day, in the freezing cold, someone would have had to presumably force her out of the house without anyone in the neighborhood noticing. And somehow they would manage to get lucky because the front door the Mellon home was unlocked and Rachel was alone sleeping.  Yet as far as we know, everything in the home was normal, with the exception of Rachel missing and her bedding, it’s not like there were things out of place or signs of a struggle. 

As police were investigating, they found that there were no signs of forced entry. I didn’t really understand this statement because Vince had stated that the front door was left unlocked…so if, as Amy’s mother believed that someone had walked in and kidnapped Rachel, it’s not like they would have had to try very hard, but I digress. In an article I was reading in the Chicago Tribune where I got a lot of the information from this case, Vince is interviewed he himself remarks that it had been far too long, and quote “As cold as it’s been, it just doesn’t make sense.” So even he realizes that things are not adding up, he has a completely flat and emotionless demeanor about him in every interview I’ve read, I just don’t buy whatsoever that any of this is really accurate. His affect in the video clips that I’ve seen in the news just don’t come across as someone who’s worried about Rachel at all. Just looking at his body language, you can see the tension simmering beneath the surface and like there was nothing behind his eyes. It gave me chills.

I was reading an article by the Daily Herald where the reporter describes how Jeff wandered into Rachel’s room one day, put on the headphones attached to Rachel’s walkman and hit play to Alanis Morissette’s “Jagged Little Pill” which had become one of her favorite artists at the time, and it really struck a chord with me just imagining him sitting on that empty bed… it really breaks your heart. The last time Jeff had spoken with his daughter was Christmas Day, and Rachel had gently teased him about the TLC album “CrazySexyCool” That he had gotten her as a present, saying it was “so last season” because she was growing up and no longer a little kid that liked pop music, which I found to be funny because I could remember saying something similar to my own dad at her age. She had also told Jeff that she would like to live with him someday in Texas. 

While the days continued to go by with no sign of Rachel, police began to realize that it was unlikely Rachel had left on her own; finally they began searching the immediate area by going door to door, there were also searches by land, air and water using helicopters, dogs, horses, drones, geothermal imaging and dive teams. Even Jeff’s home in Dallas was searched, along with his sister’s home in Oxford, Mississippi. Despite these search efforts, Rachel seemed to have completely vanished into thin air without a trace. 

On February 4th, 1996 Police told reporters that there was quote unquote “no evidence of foul play”  as they hadn’t found evidence of a crime, but they were completely bewildered as to what could have happened to her. By February 22nd, The police continued to insist there was no evidence of foul play. Amy and Vince Mellon hired a private investigator, Cynthia Georgantas, fearing that Rachel’s case could fade from the spotlight. 

More months pass, and in July Amy Mellon appears on the Jerry Springer Show where a psychic tells Amy that she believes Rachel is dead. I can’t quite say that I’d have chosen Jerry Springer as my platform, but I understand wanting to use whatever means there is available in order to get out the word...but if I’m being really honest and I know this is a divisive topic, but I’m not a big fan of relying upon psychics. 

Again more time passes, and by October 13, Rachel’s 14th birthday (which by the way was also just a few days ago at the time of this recording) she was still missing. Jeff returned to Bolingbrook, Illinois days later, hoping to quote “stir things up” and I have to really commend Jeff on his strength, because he has been at the forefront of the search for Rachel all these years. Jeff ended up moving back to Bolingbrook, Illinois, he said that he just couldn’t bear to be so far away in Texas and I’d imagine that indeed it must have been really hard.

In January of 1997, things really start to get messy. Amy decided to freeze out police because of their suspicion that Vince had killed her, saying quote “I found out that they made up their minds that Vince is a suspect and that's that.” Then just one day before the one year anniversary of Rachel’s birthday, it’s revealed that Ken Skemp, Rachel’s grandfather, had received two letters demanding that he return Rachel and threatening his life. However, Ken believed at the time that this was a hoax by a Chicago TV reporter, which is just sad. I couldn’t find more about this online, although I know that it’s fairly common for families to receive false tips and it just really sickens me. 

So more years pass, and at the four year mark is when things really heat up in this case. There’s a diary with an incriminating entry that will completely blow your mind....there is an intersection with an infamous Bolingbrook murderer who actually worked as a detective on Rachel’s case, and even a subpoena to testify before a grand jury.

All that and more to come Next Saturday, in Part 2.

References

News articles

Studies

Other

Episode 1: The Murder of Karen Santillan Tait


About this Episode:
Project Sunlight host, Rissa, discusses the case of 23-year-old Karen Santillan Tait, a Filipino American woman who was murdered in Waynesboro, West Virginia. 

 

Show Notes

An undated photograph of Karen Santillan Tait.

An undated photograph of Karen Santillan Tait.

Transcript

RISSA: Hello and welcome listeners to the first episode of Project Sunlight. This podcast is based on the more than 100 missing and murdered Filipina women in the United States identified and documented in a database developed by me, Rissa. Each episode will feature the case of a Filipina who is missing or has been murdered. I’ll also be hosting roundtable discussion episodes with a wide variety of guests that will help us understand the many ways social science and true crime intersect. 

When I began learning about the epidemic of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women in the United States and Canada, I was compelled to research intimate partner violence against Filipinas as a member of the Filipino American community. What I found was beyond disheartening. 

According to a 2017 study, 41 – 61% of Asian women report experiencing physical and/or sexual violence by an intimate partner during their lifetime. A 2011 study reported that 68% of Filipinas and 50% of Indian and Pakistani women have been stalked by an intimate partner. In states like Hawaii, where Filipinos are the second largest ethnic group, Filipinas are disproportionately more likely to be fatal victims of domestic violence compared to other groups such as Native Hawaiians and Japanese. 

The scarcity of information on missing and murdered Filipinas throughout the country has been pervasive. Due to a lack of data disaggregation by ethnicity, Filipino Americans are chronically understudied. Without this crucial data, women, like the one whose story you’ll hear next, will continue to be ignored by mainstream media outlets, likely because the implications of domestic violence among couples whose marriages have been commodified by an intentional framework of colonization and exploitation are far too controversial for the evening news. 


Sadly, this case has even more scandal and heartbreak beyond this broader conversation; the twists and turns will leave you breathless. 

On September 26, 2002, a hiker discovered the badly decomposed body of a woman in Hart’s run of Greenbrier State Forest, a 5,133-acre state forest between Lewisburg and White Sulphur Springs in Greenbrier County, West Virginia. The body had been dumped off of an embankment along Greenbrier State Forest Road, 4.7 miles south of where it intersects with Interstate 64. The forest is close to The Greenbrier, the state’s renowned historic resort; a declassified Cold War fallout shelter. This is an area frequented by the public for its picturesque mountain terrain, streams, hiking trails, and onsite camping. According to The Register-Herald, the hiker had paused at a wide spot in the road while on an early morning walk, it was a gray autumn day. Looking over a hillside, the hiker caught a glimpse of the bottoms of her feet. 

The woman was wearing a red tank top and orange Mercata brand shorts only sold in Walmart stores in Mexico. At only 100 pounds with a small petite frame, first responders determined the woman to be of Asian or Hispanic descent. She had an olive complexion and dark hair. She was found to have a single yellow metal post-style earring with a clear stone. Located nearby were a pair of green swimming goggles. A medical examiner would determine her time of death to be approximately one month before her body’s discovery. The woman’s death was ruled a homicide by suffocation. In this same article by Jessica Farrish of the Register-Herald, she describes the investigators as initially believing that the woman could be one of the many Mexican migrant workers building a new golf course at The GreenBrier Resort in White Sulphur Springs. Until her identification, she would simply be known as ‘Jane Doe’. 

Investigator Lt. Vince Deeds of the West Virginia State Police Lewis detachment (now of the Beckley detachment) remarked that the woman hadn’t been buried but had just been quote “tossed out.” Deeds, a cold case enthusiast, told the reporter for the Register-Herald that he drives his wife crazy talking about cold cases. 

Right away, Deeds employed the help of the only Hispanic officer in the Lewisburg detachment and they canvassed the transient Mexican community together, but no one knew the woman. They had hoped that someone was just too distrustful of the police to report the woman missing. 

Weeks and months passed but Deeds continued to work the case, sending DNA samples to other nearby police agencies for comparison to DNA of missing women in other states. After two years of no new leads, Deeds sent the woman’s dental records to the Smithsonian Museum and research center in Washington, where a researcher would identify her race. She was likely Asian. 

The investigators entered Jane Doe’s DNA records were into the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Combined DNA Index System (CODIS). 

For years, the case would go cold. There wouldn’t be a breakthrough until March 18, 2011, with the report of abuse by an elementary school-aged girl in Waynesboro, VA, after attending an abuse seminar called “Hugs and Kisses” telling the teacher that she was a victim of abuse at home and had been for several years. This little girl was about 10, 11-years-old. 

When Waynesboro Police department Cp. Alyssa Campbell arrived on the doorstep of a mobile home in Patches Trailer Park, it was to investigate 52-year-old Thomas Neal Tait for allegations of child sex abuse, Campbell noticed that Tait had quote “reams of computers” which spurred police to obtain a search warrant, resulting in the discovery of more than 80,000 images of child pornography. These images featured mostly girls and babies. According to Campbell’s commanding officer, Sgt. R.B. Luzader, Tait built computers. 

Farrish writes that when Campbell asked him about the girl’s mother, she noticed he was nervous. He told police that she had simply left to return to her family in Legazpi City, the Philippines, but failed to give them a solid answer as to when she left and where she was staying. He became evasive and hostile, maintaining that Karen had abandoned their family for her village to be with her parents and siblings. Tait never reported his wife missing. Karen’s daughter told investigators that she believed her mother was living in the Philippines, but she wasn’t sure. 

Tait met his wife, Karen Santillan, in 1997 when she was 19 in a burger shop in Legazpi City. He was 36-years-old. She was described as a meek and timid young woman. Karen was from an extremely poor village outside of Legazpi City and was her parents’ youngest daughter. Legazpi City is located in the province of Albay, renowned for its natural beauty, featuring black sand beaches and an active volcano, Mt. Mayon. It’s known for its booming tourism industry, but much of the urban poor live in makeshift shanty towns teeming with garbage. 

He had traveled there for the sole purpose of finding a wife. By contrast, Karen had never traveled far from the area she called home. Tait had been traveling back and forth from the U.S. and the Philippines; Investigator Lt. Deeds remarked to the Register-Herald that there were several areas in the Philippines thriving on sex trade. I’ve heard these kinds of men referred to as “sex pats” - a play on the word expat or expatriate. 

In 1998, Thomas Neal Tait married Karen. In 2000, Karen became pregnant and she legally immigrated to the United States in July of that year, living in Waynesboro, Virginia. She had high hopes of a better life for her new family and later gave birth to their child, a daughter. According to Lieutenant Deeds, Karen thought she had met her “American dream.”

But the pair’s relationship was anything but marital bliss. Tait was described by investigators as a “control freak” and while he took Karen to state parks, he didn’t quote-unquote “allow” her to go to more public places. One undated picture I came across shows Karen perched on rocks beside a stream in what looks to be a forested area. She’s wearing a pink shirt with a pair of sunglasses around her neck and blue denim jeans with her hands clasped on her knees. Her dark long dark hair is parted to one side, her eyes are brown, and her smile is bright, with just a hint of the timidness that her neighbors had described to the media saying that when they saw her, which was rare, she was timid but friendly. 

In 2002, Karen’s family in the Philippines lost contact with her. Her family told investigators that they assumed she was simply happy and thriving in the United States. She was 23 at the time of her disappearance.

With Tait’s explanation not adding up, Campbell continued to try to find evidence of Karen’s return to the Philippines. Despite the language barrier and with the help of Interpol and the US State Department, Campbell was able to confirm that indeed Karen had not returned home to her village as her husband had claimed. Karen’s daughter was removed from the home. 

On December 16, 2011, Karen Santillan Tait was declared an involuntary missing person by the Waynesboro police department. A DNA profile was developed using a sample from her child and her parents in the Philippines. According to a press release by the Waynesboro Police Department, the profile linked to an unidentified case that had been entered into CODIS by the West Virginia Medical examiner’s office. Based on these results, dental records were requested from the Philippines and compared to remains of ‘Jane Doe’ confirming Karen’s identity along with additional forensic testing. 

The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in West Virginia notified The Waynesboro Police Department on October 16, 2012, that the remains found in Greenbrier Forest State Park were Karen’s. After ten years of lying in a West Virginia morgue as ‘Jane Doe’, she was finally no longer nameless. 

On July 16, 2012, Thomas Neal Tait was charged with 20 counts of Possession of Child pornography and convicted of those crimes on September 26, 2012, ten years to the day of the discovery of his wife’s body. As Tait was sitting in jail awaiting his sentencing for the pornography convictions, police issued a murder warrant and worked to get him extradited to West Virginia to face a murder charge. Police revealed that it was the totality of the evidence, that lead to their decision to charge him with Karen’s murder. According to court records, it was on November 1st, 2012 when Tait confessed to killing Karen in an interview with two Department of State investigators.

Tait plead guilty to being charged with second-degree murder on Valentine’s Day of 2013. A judge ordered him to serve 30 years in prison. Three days later, Tait appeared in court again to be sentenced for the 20 counts of possession of child pornography that would earn him an additional 30 years in prison to be served concurrently in Virginia. As Tait hung his head in silence, the judge remarked that what was found on Tait’s computers quote “shocks the conscience of the court.” Investigators believe that Tait killed Karen so that he would have a child to abuse without her being in the way. Prosecutors argued that Tait had shown no remorse throughout the investigation, comparing his behavior to that of a psychopath. 

"I believe he needs to spend the rest of his life in prison. Thirty years is more than fair," said Sgt. W.A. Pendleton of the West Virginia State Police.

The Greenbrier County prosecution team was satisfied with the judge’s ruling. Although West Virginia’s parole laws could have allowed Tait to walk free in as little as ten years, Tait will serve his time in Virginia where there is no chance of parole. Jurisdiction in the case was hard to pin down without being able to determine the precise location of Karen’s death. According to another article by Tina Alvey of the Register-Herald, the age of the evidence in Karen’s case made it impossible to determine whether the crime met the legal standard for a first-degree murder charge.

Cpl. Alyssa Campbell’s role in bringing about justice for Karen Santillan Tait can’t be understated enough. Her exhaustive work with what began as a child abuse investigation turned into a child pornography investigation and finally, a murder investigation was recognized by the media and the Waynesboro police department with pride. Campbell was presented with the Police Star Medal for quote “resourcefulness, tenacity and leadership above the ordinary call of duty.” It had been ten years since the last time an officer had been given the award by the department. 

There was still the hurdle of having Karen’s cremated remains returned to her family in the Philippines so that she might finally rest in peace. Karen’s family was described by Campbell as “indigent” or extremely poor, living meal to meal and could not afford to bring their daughter’s body to the Philippines. In October of 2013, the Waynesboro County Police Foundation held a fundraiser to cover the cost of cremation and repatriating Karen’s ashes to Legazpi City for burial, asking for tax-deductible donations to the Karen Santillan Tait Fund. A news article with the News Virginian describes the police department as receiving a donation of $32 in a wad of crumpled bills the day after the fundraiser’s announcement from a local woman who had heard about the case on the radio. Campbell hoped the fundraiser would help bring about closure to Karen’s grateful family in the Philippines, calling the closure of the investigation’s final chapter “bittersweet” in one interview with the press.

A week later, The Waynesboro County Police Chief announced it had surpassed its $6,000 goal with overwhelming community support. They expressed their gratitude and said that any additional money would be placed in an education fund for Karen’s daughter. On October 23, 2013, the Embassy of the Philippines announced that it expected the arrival of Karen’s ashes in Legazpi City that week, which would then be turned over to her family. 

The ambassador of the Philippines to the United States at that time, Ambassador Jose L. Cuisia, Jr. thanked the police department for their work and remarked that had it not been for the efforts of the prosecution and officers like Cpl. Alyssa Campbell, quote “Our kababayan would most likely remain nameless and her killer would still be on the loose,” going on to say that now Karen could finally rest in peace with her loved ones in the Philippines. However, there would be another tragic, unexpected twist in Karen’s story, years later. 

In May of 2016, a news article by journalist Kate White of the Charleston Gazette-Mail stated that a former employee of the West Virginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner filed a lawsuit alleging to have been fired for refusing to discard the remains of a homicide victim that should not have still been in the office. The lawsuit describes the employee’s refusal to participate in what they called “illegal immoral conduct.” It also states that at the time, the office had a backlog of cases over 40 years old. She had found the remains while organizing a storage cooler she described as messy and in complete disarray. 

Regina Banks, the former employee who was working as a death investigator at the time, says she was shocked to learn that either the victim’s family had received the wrong person’s remains, or they had not been sent at all and that quote “the reports were inaccurate.” Banks claims that she was ordered to burn the remains and make them disappear. Although Banks doesn’t formally name the victim whose remains she discovered in the cooler, she alleges that the remains were of a woman whose family had raised money to have their daughter’s remains shipped overseas for burial. These were the remains of Karen Santillan Tait. 

Banks says that her supervisors prevented her from contacting Karen’s family. The lawsuit goes on to make other hair-raising allegations; Banks also discovered the remains of a fetus from the 1990s, which her supervisors instructed her to burn and then throw out. Despite protest from Banks that the child’s family should be contacted for proper burial, the lawsuit alleges that her supervisors were concerned about the length of time that had passed, that it would to quote the article, “open a can of worms” if Banks were to notify them. Additionally, Banks says she witnessed bodies being dropped on the floor and badly bruised, causing concern that doctors would not be able to determine whether these injuries occurred due to criminal conduct. 

Even more alarming, another employee had filed a lawsuit against the medical examiner’s office just months before Banks, with similar allegations. The employee had worked for the medical examiner’s office for 15 years when she claims she was fired in retaliation for refusing to participate in a scheme to cover up the mishandling of remains. A representative for the Department of Health and Human Resources refused to comment. 

The outcome of the lawsuit filed by Regina Banks is unclear, but an internet search of the West Virginia Office of the Chief Medical Examiner reveals numerous scandals, lawsuits, and reports of understaffing as a former office space bursting at the seams from lack of space. As of this podcast, there have been no further updates. 

The details of this case have been heartwrenching. But I did find one very thin silver lining so that however dark this story, we might end this episode on a high note. 

I think this is the perfect time to point out the incredible courage it must have taken this young girl to tell her teacher about the abuse she suffered from Thomas Neal Tait. She told the investigators the truth about his dark secrets and as a result, it was finally discovered that this a sexual abuse investigation was only one part of Tait’s sick master plan. After being removed from her father’s home, Karen’s daughter was placed with other family members in the United States. 

A study that I read while researching this case (which I’ll also link in the show notes on projectsunlightpodcast.com) reports that less older Filipina women report abuse to police than younger women, a few reasons being: a general unfamiliarity with the law in the United States, language barriers, immigration status, lack of a family support system (remember many Filipinas leave their entire families behind) and shame. With the Philippines identifying as 80% Catholic and an export of nearly 6,000 people a day leaving home for better opportunities, it’s not surprising findings reveal that 1st generation Filipinas have more difficulty in reaching out for help.

We can reasonably conclude that educational programs designed to encourage the report of child abuse like the one, in this case, can in fact work, really really well. Karen’s daughter grew up here in the United States, presumably, her first language is English and that could have easily been another mitigating factor in the difference between her decision to report abuse, and how her mother navigated the abuse in her marriage to Tait. 

Karen’s daughter reported her father’s abuse and as a result, she and her family would finally learn the truth about what had happened to her mother, who left her home on the other side of the world to fulfill her American Dream. Despite the horrible outcome of this case, I think we can say that Karen’s daughter is proof that Filipinas can survive abuse and reclaim their lives when given the help and resources our community so desperately needs. 

If you or someone you know is experiencing abuse, you can call the 24/7 National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-(SAFE), or 1-800-799-7233 for anonymous, confidential help. That’s 1-800-799-7233.



References

News Articles

Studies